← New Search ↗ Social Card

Raegan Wurm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-01-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 11 13 24 0.960 0.1542 0.1542
2019-20 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 25 16 20 36 1.440 0.2313 0.2313
2020-21 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 19 7 3 10 0.526 0.0845 0.0845
2021-22 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 26 11 8 19 0.731 0.1174 0.1174
2022-23 Buffalo High USHS-MN-W 26 10 4 14 0.538 0.0865 0.0865
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HEA-W JR 36 4 3 7 0.194
2024-25 Maine D1 HEA-W SO 35 2 4 6 0.171
2023-24 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 34 5 1 6 0.176
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.18
2023-24 · Maine
+108.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#8262
Forward overall
#351
Forward born in 2005
#2355
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.