← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

McKenzie Grimm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-07 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.23
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2638
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.53
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6210
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
75%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 29 10 14 24 0.828 0.2956 0.2956
2024-25 Pittsburgh Penguins Elite 19U 19U-AAA-W 32 11 14 25 0.781 0.2487 0.2487
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Franklin Pierce NEWHA FR 36 3 4 7 0.194

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Taylor Williamson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG 0.395 Minnesota
Emily Gunderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.64 PPG 0.171 Lindenwood
Christi Vetter USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.67 PPG 0.000 Penn State
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Callie Wollschlager 2018-19 · 0.74 PPG 0.810 Adrian NCHA
Bailey Olson 2018-19 · 1.48 PPG 0.407 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Julianne Bradford 2022-23 · 1.21 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.