IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Svenja Voigt Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-29 Country: Germany
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 49 5 8 13 0.265 0.0952 0.0952 — —
2020-21 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Stanstead College Varsity (W) CAHS-W 31 12 13 25 0.806 0.2894 0.2894 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SR 29 2 5 7 0.241
2024-25 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W JR 32 0 3 3 0.094
2023-24 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W SO 28 1 1 2 0.071
2022-23 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W FR 31 3 2 5 0.161
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.16
2022-23 · St. Cloud State
-34.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
75%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3688
Forward overall
#161
Forward born in 2004
#57
in CAHS-W

D1 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Casey Leveillee
Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.