IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mikayla Boarder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-04-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Shawnigan Lake School CSSHL-U18W 8 4 5 9 1.125 0.2577 0.2577 — —
2020-21 Shawnigan Lake School CSSHL-U18W 0 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2021-22 Shawnigan Lake School CSSHL-U18W 24 21 25 46 1.917 0.4391 0.4391 — —
2022-23 Shawnigan Lake School CSSHL-U18W 30 19 41 60 2.000 0.4582 0.4582 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Maine D1 HEA-W JR 36 4 2 6 0.167
2024-25 Maine D1 HEA-W SO 35 8 6 14 0.400
2023-24 Maine D1 HEA-W FR 32 4 5 9 0.281
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.39
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2023-24 · Maine
-27.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 38 comparables)

3%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
97%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#876
Forward overall
#21
Forward born in 2004
#5
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Reagan Haley
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lauren Abbenante
Holy Cross ·
0.607 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.