IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Makena Lloyd-Howe Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-02 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Okanagan HA U18 Prep Bl CSSHL-U18W 28 4 11 15 0.536 0.1227 0.1227 — —
2022-23 Okanagan HA U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 10 13 23 0.767 0.1757 0.1757 — —
2023-24 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 8 21 29 0.967 0.2215 0.2215 — —
2024-25 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 8 18 26 0.867 0.1986 0.1986 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Vermont D1 HEA-W FR 35 2 4 6 0.171
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2025-26 · Vermont
-3.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3899
Forward overall
#150
Forward born in 2007
#82
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Madison Woo
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
UConn ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Sydney Brodt
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Madison Woo
Brown ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.