IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Milana Butera Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-08 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Windsor Southwest Wildcats OWHL-U22 13 0 5 5 0.385 0.1347 0.1347 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W SR 36 1 5 6 0.167
2024-25 LIU D2 CHA-W JR 33 2 1 3 0.091
2024-25 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W JR 36 2 1 3 0.083
2023-24 LIU D2 CHA-W SO 31 1 3 4 0.129
2023-24 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W SO 32 1 3 4 0.125
2022-23 LIU D1 CHA-W FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Long Island Univ. D1 CHA-W FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6228
Forward overall
#288
Forward born in 2004
#403
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Emily Antony
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.92 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average
NCAAe PPG
Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Carly Bullock
Princeton ·
0.812 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.