IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Elisabeth Gerebi Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-06-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 25 4 12 16 0.640 0.0966 0.0966 — —
2019-20 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 24 10 9 19 0.792 0.1195 0.1195 — —
2020-21 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 16 5 1 6 0.375 0.0566 0.0566 — —
2021-22 Chaska/Chanhassen USHS-MN-W 23 10 10 20 0.870 0.1313 0.1313 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SR 34 0 6 6 0.176
2025-26 St. Michael's College D3 — SR 34 0 6 6 0.176
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA JR 36 2 2 4 0.111
2024-25 St. Michael's College D3 — JR 32 0 2 2 0.062
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA SO 36 3 4 7 0.194
2023-24 St. Michael's College D3 — SO 24 2 1 3 0.125
2022-23 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA FR 29 3 4 7 0.241
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2022-23 · St. Michael's College
+140.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

2%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7454
Forward overall
#331
Forward born in 2003
#1923
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Amanda Bäckebo
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Syracuse (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lydia Passolt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.89 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.35 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Amanda Bäckebo
Syracuse ·
0.056 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lydia Passolt
Bemidji State ·
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Vilma Tanskanen
North Dakota ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.