Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | Toronto Aeros U22 AA | OWHL-U22 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.182 | 0.0637 | 0.0637 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Post | CHA-W | SR | 37 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0.135 |
| 2024-25 | Post | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.139 |
| 2024-25 | Post | CHA-W | JR | 32 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.094 |
| 2023-24 | Post | CHA-W | SO | 36 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.139 |
| 2023-24 | Post | CHA-W | SO | 30 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0.033 |
| 2022-23 | Post | CHA-W | FR | 20 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0.200 |
| 2022-23 | Post | CHA-W | FR | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0.133 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rose Rather | NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG | 0.824 | Holy Cross |
| Sierra Smith | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.40 PPG | 0.000 | Minnesota |
| Taylor Heise | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG | 0.897 | Minnesota |
| Mallorie Iozzo | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kylie Ligday | 2022-23 · 0.81 PPG | 0.280 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Jorja Jusczak | 2023-24 · 1.00 PPG | 0.240 | Saint Benedict | MIAC |
| Aubree McDonagh | 2023-24 · 0.59 PPG | 0.360 | St. Catherine | MIAC |
| Mckenzie Perry | 2024-25 · 2.30 PPG | 0.100 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Olivia Patnode | 2022-23 · 0.63 PPG | — | Saint Mary's | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.