IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talya Hendrickson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-06-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 24 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2019-20 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 18 36 54 2.160 0.3469 0.3469 — —
2020-21 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 22 17 36 53 2.409 0.3869 0.3869 — —
2021-22 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 35 54 89 2.967 0.4765 0.4765 — —
2022-23 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 38 63 101 3.367 0.5407 0.5407 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 28 1 4 5 0.179
2024-25 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 37 1 6 7 0.189
2023-24 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 35 3 2 5 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.48
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2023-24 · Bemidji State
-70.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
65%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#701
Forward overall
#17
Forward born in 2005
#12
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Saana Valkama
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.43 PPG
→ Vermont (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.54 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Annie Roche
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.88 PPG
→ Colgate
0.55 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Katie Detert
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.80 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.52 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saana Valkama
Vermont ·
0.314 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Annie Roche
Colgate ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nicole Schammel
Minnesota State ·
0.611 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.