← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Charlie Rauch Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-05-23 Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.20
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2366
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.50
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.5799
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

35%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
65%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 19U-AAA-W 3 1 2 3 1.000 0.4105 0.4105
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 New Hampshire HEA-W SO 34 1 4 5 0.147
2024-25 New Hampshire HEA-W FR 32 1 3 4 0.125

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Lauren Abbenante NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG 0.607 Holy Cross
Reagan Haley USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.108 Minnesota Duluth
Dana Rasmussen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG 0.167 Ohio State
Haley Mack USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG 0.371 Bemidji State
Katie Rooney USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG 0.219 RPI

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Megan Lyke 2016-17 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Lake Forest NCHA
Madison Davis 2016-17 · 1.12 PPG 0.962 Hamline MIAC
Cheyenne Abear 2018-19 · 1.24 PPG 0.875 Hamline MIAC
Dani Kocina 2013-14 · 1.88 PPG 0.581 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Tristan Wicklund 2021-22 · 1.23 PPG 0.871 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.