← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mia Kenmore Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-03-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 25 3 5 8 0.320 0.0733 0.0733
2019-20 Pursuit of Excellence CSSHL-U18W 10 4 2 6 0.600 0.1375 0.1375
2020-21 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 7 2 1 3 0.429 0.0982 0.0982
2021-22 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 26 15 12 27 1.038 0.2379 0.2379
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SR 37 3 1 4 0.108
2024-25 Stonehill D1 NEWHA JR 38 2 1 3 0.079
2023-24 Stonehill D1 NEWHA SO 32 0 0 0 0.000
2022-23 Stonehill D1 NEWHA FR 35 3 6 9 0.257
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2022-23 · Stonehill
+74.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4844
Forward overall
#218
Forward born in 2004
#112
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Providence (0.66 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.54 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Quinnipiac ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Providence ·
0.657 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.