IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Leila Ricciuti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 43 14 16 30 0.698 0.2443 0.2443 — —
2023-24 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 38 14 23 37 0.974 0.3410 0.3410 — —
2024-25 Nepean Wildcats OWHL-U22 32 10 21 31 0.969 0.3393 0.3393 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 UConn D1 HEA-W FR 22 1 2 3 0.136
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2025-26 · UConn
-53.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

32%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1864
Forward overall
#72
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.26 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Carly Bullock
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (0.81 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooklynn Schugel
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.270 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan McLaughlin
Minnesota State ·
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Catherine Skaja
Minnesota ·
0.342 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.