IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Anezka Cabelova Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-08-21 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 10 27 37 1.321 0.3027 0.3027 — —
2024-25 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 4 35 39 1.300 0.2978 0.2978 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Boston University D1 HEA-W — 25 1 2 3 0.120
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.26
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.12
2025-26 · Boston University
-53.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2073
Forward overall
#76
Forward born in 2006
#28
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Casey Leveillee
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.63 PPG
→ Vermont (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Casey Leveillee
Vermont ·
0.265 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.