← New Search ↗ Social Card

Abby Garvin Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-09-27 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 22 0 1 1 0.045 0.0073 0.0073
2020-21 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 17 1 2 3 0.176 0.0283 0.0283
2021-22 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 28 5 11 16 0.571 0.0918 0.0918
2022-23 Benilde-St. Margaret's (W) USHS-MN-W 23 5 7 12 0.522 0.0838 0.0838
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA 30 1 2 3 0.100
2025-26 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA JR 30 1 2 3 0.100
2024-25 College of the Holy Cross D1 NEWHA 34 1 0 1 0.029
2024-25 Holy Cross D1 NEWHA SO 30 1 0 1 0.033
2023-24 St. Thomas D1 CHA-W FR 7 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9718
Forward overall
#459
Forward born in 2004
#3182
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.