← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Cameron Crawford Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-07-11 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.14
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1652
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.40
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.4673
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

35%
NCAA D1W
5%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 33 5 3 8 0.242 0.0849 0.0849
2024-25 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 18 6 11 17 0.944 0.3307 0.3307
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Merrimack HEA-W FR 17 0 2 2 0.118

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Carly Bullock USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 0.812 Princeton
Karlie Lund USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.20 PPG 1.182 Princeton
Catherine Skaja USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.21 PPG 0.342 Minnesota
Jordan McLaughlin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.22 PPG 0.294 Minnesota State
Haley Mack USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG 0.371 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Allie Bussey 2018-19 · 1.12 PPG 1.062 St. Scholastica NCHA
Alex Toupal 2011-12 · 1.84 PPG 0.652 Amherst NESCAC
Cheyenne Abear 2016-17 · 1.36 PPG 0.875 Hamline MIAC
Sydney Simone 2015-16 · 1.12 PPG 1.071 Lake Forest NCHA
Hailey Herdine 2015-16 · 1.00 PPG 1.185 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.