IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Hannah Thornton Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Whitby Wolves OWHL-U22 63 9 17 26 0.413 0.1443 0.1443 — —
2023-24 Whitby Wolves OWHL-U22 54 21 27 48 0.889 0.3108 0.3108 — —
2024-25 Whitby Wolves OWHL-U22 33 6 27 33 1.000 0.3496 0.3496 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Robert Morris D1 CHA-W — 28 0 2 2 0.071
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.29
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.07
2025-26 · Robert Morris
-75.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
62%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2196
Forward overall
#79
Forward born in 2006
#85
in OWHL-U22

D1 Comparables

Karlie Lund
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.17 PPG
→ Princeton (1.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.16 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.16 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Karlie Lund
Princeton ·
1.182 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Haley Mack
Bemidji State ·
0.371 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.