IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Myah Krueger Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-10-28 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 23 11 16 27 1.174 0.1885 0.1885 — —
2021-22 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 27 11 19 30 1.111 0.1784 0.1784 — —
2022-23 Stillwater High (women) USHS-MN-W 26 13 19 32 1.231 0.1977 0.1977 — —
2023-24 Minnesota Ice Cougars 19U AAA 19U-AAA-W 44 25 24 49 1.114 0.3847 0.3847 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 St. Cloud State D1 WCHA-W — 35 1 0 1 0.029
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.27
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2025-26 · St. Cloud State
-89.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

30%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#2366
Forward overall
#71
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Corbin Boyd
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Darby Dodds
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
Brittany Wheeler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.32 PPG
→ Yale (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebekah Kolstad
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.32 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lauren Hespenheide
St. Cloud State ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corbin Boyd
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Darby Dodds
Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.