IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brielle Kelly-Paquet Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2007-02-14 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 26 3 4 7 0.269 0.0617 0.0617 — —
2022-23 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 4 16 20 0.667 0.1527 0.1527 — —
2023-24 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 28 8 15 23 0.821 0.1882 0.1882 — —
2024-25 RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep CSSHL-U18W 30 5 18 23 0.767 0.1757 0.1757 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Dartmouth D1 ECAC-W — 30 0 1 1 0.033
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2025-26 · Dartmouth
-78.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
98%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#4670
Forward overall
#196
Forward born in 2007
#108
in CSSHL-U18W

D1 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Jordan Chancellor
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Yale (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Danielle Marmer
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Grace Zumwinkle
Minnesota ·
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Chancellor
Yale ·
0.517 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Danielle Marmer
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.