Based on 40 comparable players
Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-W PPG | Age-Adjusted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 26 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 0.269 | 0.0617 | 0.0617 |
| 2022-23 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 4 | 16 | 20 | 0.667 | 0.1527 | 0.1527 |
| 2023-24 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 28 | 8 | 15 | 23 | 0.821 | 0.1882 | 0.1882 |
| 2024-25 | RINK HA Kelowna U18 Prep | CSSHL-U18W | 30 | 5 | 18 | 23 | 0.767 | 0.1757 | 0.1757 |
| Season | School | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-26 | Dartmouth | ECAC-W | FR | 30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.033 |
| Player | League · Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gabbie Hughes | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 1.121 | Minnesota Duluth |
| Laura Anderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG | 0.290 | Yale |
| Natalie Snodgrass | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 1.000 | UConn |
| Kaylee Druk | USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG | 0.000 | Syracuse |
| Tianna Gunderson | USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.20 PPG | 0.069 | Minnesota |
| Player | Junior Season · PPG | FR College PPG | School | Conference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grace Karakas | 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG | 0.417 | SUNY Cortland | SUNYAC |
| Abigail Chamernick | 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG | 0.500 | Hamline | MIAC |
| Jenna Allen | 2023-24 · 0.93 PPG | 0.586 | Augsburg | MIAC |
| Riley Viner | 2011-12 · 1.83 PPG | 0.308 | Gustavus Adolphus | MIAC |
| Wendy Roberts | 2012-13 · 2.64 PPG | 0.214 | Bethel | MIAC |
Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.
NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.