IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lauren Mack Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-11-05 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 23 1 10 11 0.478 0.0768 0.0768 — —
2021-22 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 11 16 27 0.871 0.1399 0.1399 — —
2022-23 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 30 8 17 25 0.833 0.1338 0.1338 — —
2023-24 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 31 19 32 51 1.645 0.2642 0.2642 — —
2024-25 Minnetonka High (W) USHS-MN-W 28 13 25 38 1.357 0.2180 0.2180 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Providence D1 HEA-W — 34 0 1 1 0.029
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.03
2025-26 · Providence
-85.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
2%
NCAA D2/D3
85%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#3592
Forward overall
#135
Forward born in 2006
#511
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Sena Hanson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Brown (0.63 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Savannah Quandt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.36 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Molly Strabley
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Princeton (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.40 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sena Hanson
Brown ·
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Savannah Quandt
Minnesota ·
0.111 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Molly Strabley
Princeton ·
0.103 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.