← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Julie Duce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2256
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.54
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6263
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

12%
NCAA D1W
0%
NCAA D3W
88%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2022-23 16U-AAA-W 19 6 6 12 0.632 0.2256 0.2256
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2025-26 Saint Anselm NEWHA FR 5 0 0 0 0.000

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Danielle Marmer 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG 0.108 Quinnipiac
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG 0.027 UConn
Aly Tremblay USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG 0.030 RPI
Jacqueline Kaasa USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Sydney Brodt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG 0.600 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Rylan Kissel 2024-25 · 1.11 PPG 0.577 Bethel MIAC
Delaney Carle 2015-16 · 1.81 PPG 0.346 Nazareth UCHC
Kelly O'Sullivan 2011-12 · 0.52 PPG 1.194 Adrian NCHA
Sierra Hanowski 2010-11 · 1.67 PPG 0.375 St. Scholastica NCHA
Hannah Zavoral 2015-16 · 1.56 PPG Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.