← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alizée Leblanc Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2005-03-27 Country: Canada
Signed Professionally
Toronto Metro Univ. · USports-W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Ridley College OWHL-U22 11 3 1 4 0.364 0.1273 0.1273
2022-23 Ridley College OWHL-U22 33 11 5 16 0.485 0.1698 0.1698
2025-26 Toronto Metro Univ. USports-W 26 2 3 5 0.192 0.0846 0.0846
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 36 2 6 8 0.222
2023-24 St. Michael's College D1 NEWHA 36 5 4 9 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2023-24 · St. Michael's College
+91.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
92%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6380
Forward overall
#270
Forward born in 2005

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Minnesota ·
0.257 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.069 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Cornell ·
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.