IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michelle Löwenhielm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-03-22 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Färjestad BK · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 — SDHL 25 8 5 13 0.520 0.6081 0.7444 — —
2011-12 AIK SDHL 28 14 24 38 1.357 1.5871 1.8429 — —
2012-13 AIK SDHL 26 12 16 28 1.077 1.2594 1.4444 — —
2013-14 AIK SDHL 27 6 13 19 0.704 0.8230 0.9268 — —
2018-19 Connecticut Whale PHF 16 3 3 6 0.375 — — — —
2019-20 HV71 SDHL 36 14 16 30 0.833 0.9745 0.9745 — —
2020-21 HV71 SDHL 36 19 30 49 1.361 1.5918 1.5918 — —
2021-22 SDE HF SDHL 34 10 16 26 0.765 0.8943 0.7471 — —
2022-23 SDE HF SDHL 31 11 18 29 0.935 1.0941 0.8727 — —
2023-24 SDE HF SDHL 34 11 19 30 0.882 1.0320 0.7479 — —
2024-25 SDE HF SDHL 30 8 10 18 0.600 0.7017 0.4795 — —
2025-26 Färjestad BK SDHL 36 4 19 23 0.639 0.7472 0.4819 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 35 2 9 11 0.314
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 37 2 9 11 0.297
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 37 3 5 8 0.216
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.22
2015-16 · Minnesota Duluth
-82.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 27 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#154
Forward overall
#11
Forward born in 1995
#71
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Yale (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessie Aney
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.17 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.49 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Natasia Burzynski
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.80 PPG
→ Providence (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.50 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caroline Murphy
Yale ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jessie Aney
UConn ·
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Nuutinen
North Dakota ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.