← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Shay Benson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-12-01 Country: USA Height: 5'3" (160 cm)
NCAA-W Projection
St. Thomas
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — CHA-W
0.30
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3269
Conf. Strength0.920
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.74
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8596
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

15%
NCAA D1W
25%
NCAA D3W
60%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 — 16U-AAA-W 28 25 16 41 1.464 0.5200 0.5200
2024-25 — 16U-AAA-W 7 6 3 9 1.286 0.4566 0.4566
2025-26 Moorhead High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 20 23 43 1.593 0.2405 0.2405
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Kiki Radke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG 0.273 Bemidji State
Sierra Alarid USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.93 PPG 0.188 Post

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Abigail Chamernick 2022-23 · 1.17 PPG 0.500 Hamline MIAC
Grace Karakas 2023-24 · 1.38 PPG 0.417 SUNY Cortland SUNYAC
Emily Heid 2013-14 · 1.00 PPG 0.593 Wisconsin-Superior WIAC
Ellie Patrick 2022-23 · 0.92 PPG 0.636 Keene State NEHC
Jillian Bilsborough 2021-22 · 1.21 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.