IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryce Aneloski Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1990-04-27 Country: USA
2010 · Round 7, Pick #196  ·  Ottawa Senators Ottawa Senators
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 59 8 12 20 0.339 0.2000 0.2112 1.0182 1.0751
2008-09 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 38 4 8 12 0.316 0.1863 0.1884 0.9485 0.9591
2009-10 Cedar Rapids RoughRiders USHL 60 15 39 54 0.900 0.5309 0.5028 2.7031 2.5601
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig SR 38 5 16 21 0.553
2011-12 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig JR 38 6 14 20 0.526
2010-11 Nebraska Omaha D1 CCHA-orig SO 39 2 17 19 0.487
2008-09 Providence D1 HockeyEast FR 16 0 1 1 0.062
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.06
2008-09 · Providence
-68.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#2258
Defenseman overall
#467
Defenseman born in 1990
#1036
in USHL

D1 Comparables

Paul LaDue
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.51 D1 FR PPG)
0.43 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Lowney
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Ferris State (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.37 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Matias Cleland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Sascha Figi
Fitchburg State · 2016-17
1.429 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Rihards Marenis
Aurora · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas Signoretti
Buffalo State · 2023-24
1.120 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.