Amy Menke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-04-09 Country: USA

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2010-11	Shakopee High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	34	29	63	2.520	0.4047	0.4108	—	—
2011-12	Shakopee High (women)	USHS-MN-W	25	42	20	62	2.480	0.3983	0.3870	—	—
2012-13	Shakopee High (women)	USHS-MN-W	23	40	17	57	2.478	0.3980	0.3722	—	—
2017-18	Djurgårdens IF	SDHL	5	4	2	6	1.200	1.3860	1.3951	—	—
2018-19	Minnesota Whitecaps	PHF	15	4	6	10	0.667	—	—	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	North Dakota	D1	—	—	38	11	16	27	0.711
2015-16	North Dakota	D1	—	—	35	19	21	40	1.143

Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year

Projected PPG

0.32

before college

→

Actual FR PPG

1.14

2015-16 · North Dakota

+253.1% vs. projection

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.