IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alexis Joyce Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-04 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
HV71 · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 16 25 41 1.640 0.2634 0.2771 — —
2011-12 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 22 24 46 1.840 0.2955 0.2981 — —
2012-13 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 25 16 26 42 1.680 0.2698 0.2623 — —
2013-14 Lakeville North High USHS-MN-W 24 21 15 36 1.500 0.2409 0.2256 — —
2018-19 HV71 SDHL 36 5 10 15 0.417 0.4813 0.4839 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 38 6 17 23 0.605
2016-17 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 35 4 16 20 0.571
2015-16 Bemidji State D1 CHA-W — 36 8 12 20 0.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.56
2015-16 · Bemidji State
+145.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 32 comparables)

9%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
91%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#210
Defenseman overall
#63
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Briana Mastel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Anna Wright
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.86 PPG
→ Maine
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG
Taylor Marchin
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.77 PPG
→ Yale (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Kendra Nealey
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.14 PPG
→ Cornell (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.62 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Kelly
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Dartmouth (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Briana Mastel
Harvard ·
0.258 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG
Anna Wright
Maine ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Taylor Marchin
Yale ·
0.207 Average D
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.