← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Killmer Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: USA
NCAA-W Projection
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.28
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.3216
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.63
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.7338
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2010-11 Burnsville High (women) USHS-MN-W 24 13 14 27 1.125 0.1699 0.1699
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

College Seasons

SeasonSchoolConferenceYear GPGAPtsPPG
2012-13 St. Catherine MIAC FR 26 5 16 21 0.808

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Liz Schepers USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG 0.410 Ohio State
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Gabbie Hughes USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG 1.121 Minnesota Duluth
Laura Anderson USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.16 PPG 0.290 Yale
Grace Zumwinkle USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG 1.000 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Malia Mckinnon 2022-23 · 1.19 PPG 0.346 Bethel MIAC
Greer Hardacre 2023-24 · 1.48 PPG 0.286 Saint Benedict MIAC
Sophie Smith 2024-25 · 1.04 PPG 0.393 Lake Forest NCHA
Kora Torkelson 2011-12 · 0.64 PPG 0.643 Wisconsin-River Falls WIAC
Taylor Lesnar 2021-22 · 1.15 PPG 0.357 St. Norbert NCHA

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.