IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lynn Astrup Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-07-24 Country: USA
Signed Professionally
Minnesota Whitecaps · PHF

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 0 8 8 0.320 0.0514 0.0555 — —
2011-12 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 1 10 11 0.440 0.0707 0.0733 — —
2012-13 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 25 15 22 37 1.480 0.2377 0.2376 — —
2013-14 Warroad High (W) USHS-MN-W 27 17 38 55 2.037 0.3271 0.3153 — —
2020-21 Minnesota Whitecaps PHF 4 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 35 1 1 2 0.057
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 37 1 3 4 0.108
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W — 37 1 2 3 0.081
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.08
2015-16 · Minnesota Duluth
-66.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3014
Forward overall
#113
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.96 PPG
→ UConn (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Bergland
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.04 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Catherine Skaja
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.33 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindsay Roethke
UConn ·
0.027 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Rebecca Lindblad
UConn ·
0.057 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Emily Bergland
Bemidji State ·
0.114 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.