IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Megan Berg Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 East Ridge High (women) USHS-MN-W 22 1 3 4 0.182 0.0292 0.0292 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Minnesota D1 WCHA-W — 21 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13839
Forward overall
#6190
in USHS-MN-W

D1 Comparables

Morgan McKim
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.10 PPG
→ Cornell (0.09 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Morgan McKim
Cornell ·
0.087 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Katie Huntington
Quinnipiac ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Mallory Rushton
RIT ·
0.125 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.