← New Search ↗ Social Card

Maria Lindh Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1993-09-23 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
Djurgårdens IF · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 MoDo Hockey SDHL 24 3 12 15 0.625 0.7219 0.8298
2011-12 MoDo Hockey SDHL 28 12 8 20 0.714 0.8250 0.8964
2012-13 MoDo Hockey SDHL 21 8 7 15 0.714 0.8250 0.8846
2013-14 MoDo Hockey SDHL 20 9 5 14 0.700 0.8085 0.8501
2017-18 Djurgårdens IF SDHL 27 5 5 10 0.370 0.4278 0.3976
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W 37 5 10 15 0.405
2015-16 Minnesota Duluth D1 WCHA-W 36 6 5 11 0.306
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.86
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2015-16 · Minnesota Duluth
-64.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 18 comparables)

0%
NCAA D1
0%
NCAA D2/D3
100%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#302
Forward overall
#6
Forward born in 1993
#112
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.43 PPG
→ Lindenwood
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG
→ RPI (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.40 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.42 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.40 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.39 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.43 PPG
→ UConn (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.42 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Lindenwood ·
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
RPI ·
0.219 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota ·
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.