IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Victoria Samuelsson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-08-24 Country: Sweden
Signed Professionally
MoDo Hockey · SDHL

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 MoDo Hockey SDHL 28 6 7 13 0.464 0.5363 0.6610 — —
2012-13 MoDo Hockey SDHL 28 10 13 23 0.821 0.9487 1.1557 — —
2013-14 MoDo Hockey SDHL 24 11 9 20 0.833 0.9625 1.1525 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 35 2 8 10 0.286
2015-16 Penn State D1 WCHA-W — 36 1 12 13 0.361
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.23
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2015-16 · Penn State
-70.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#112
Forward overall
#11
Forward born in 1996
#55
in SDHL

D1 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Caitrin Lonergan
Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.