Lara Stalder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-05-15 Country: Switzerland

Set Commitment

School

Type

Date (optional)

Detected conference: () — projections will update automatically.

Notes (optional)

Projecting as:

Show:

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory

Dashed = raw PPG · ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG · ■ Green = actual college PPG

Junior Seasons

Season	Team	League	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG	NCAAe-PPG	Age-Adj	D3e-PPG	Age-Adj
2017-18	Linköping HC	SDHL	36	39	22	61	1.694	1.9816	1.9053	—	—
2018-19	Linköping HC	SDHL	18	16	22	38	2.111	2.4689	2.2800	—	—
2019-20	Brynäs IF	SDHL	36	42	29	71	1.972	2.3065	2.3065	—	—
2020-21	Brynäs IF	SDHL	36	31	51	82	2.278	2.6639	2.6639	—	—
2021-22	Brynäs IF	SDHL	33	34	55	89	2.697	3.1541	2.5008	—	—
2022-23	Brynäs IF	SDHL	32	18	43	61	1.906	2.2293	1.6833	—	—

■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor) ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor) COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Seasons (Historical)

Season	School	Div	Conference	Year	GP	G	A	Pts	PPG
2016-17	Minnesota Duluth	D1	WCHA-W	—	35	23	33	56	1.600
2015-16	Minnesota Duluth	D1	WCHA-W	—	34	17	24	41	1.206

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.