IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Casey Leveillee

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 25 12 9 21 0.840 0.3865 0.3865 — —
2010-11 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 8 5 5 10 1.250 0.5751 0.5751 — —
2011-12 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 10 17 6 23 2.300 1.0582 1.0582 — —
2012-13 Northfield Mt. Hermon NE-Prep-Girls 24 8 7 15 0.630 0.2899 0.2899 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Vermont D1 HEA-W SR 38 1 4 5 0.132
2015-16 Vermont D1 HEA-W JR 35 2 0 2 0.057
2014-15 Vermont D1 HEA-W SO 29 2 4 6 0.207
2013-14 Vermont D1 HEA-W FR 34 2 7 9 0.265
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.56
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.26
2013-14 · Vermont
-52.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#468
Forward overall
#44
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.84 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Paige Voight
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.76 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Amy Petersen
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ Penn State (0.78 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mariah Gardner
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.74 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Emily Gunderson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.71 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Liz Schepers
Ohio State ·
0.410 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Paige Voight
Merrimack ·
0.559 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amy Petersen
Penn State ·
0.784 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.