icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | Pomfret | NE-Prep-Girls | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2004-05 | Pomfret | NE-Prep-Girls | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2005-06 | Pomfret | NE-Prep-Girls | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.060 | 0.0276 | 0.0276 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Dana Hall | NE-Prep-Girls | 11 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0.450 | 0.2070 | 0.2070 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Dana Hall | NE-Prep-Girls | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1.500 | 0.6902 | 0.6902 | — | — |
| 2012-13 | Dana Hall | NE-Prep-Girls | 9 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 0.780 | 0.3589 | 0.3589 | — | — |
| 2013-14 | Dana Hall | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | SR | 29 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 0.379 |
| 2008-09 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | JR | 28 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 0.250 |
| 2007-08 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | SO | 14 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 0.357 |
| 2006-07 | Yale | D1 | ECAC-W | FR | 24 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.167 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.