IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shayna Tomlinson

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 2 4 1 5 2.500 1.1502 1.1502 — —
2012-13 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 26 24 30 54 2.080 0.9570 0.9570 — —
2013-14 St. Paul's NE-Prep-Girls 27 32 25 57 2.110 0.9708 0.9708 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Rensselaer D1 ECAC-W SR 34 6 14 20 0.588
2016-17 Rensselaer D1 ECAC-W JR 32 6 11 17 0.531
2015-16 Rensselaer D1 ECAC-W SO 33 6 9 15 0.455
2014-15 Rensselaer D1 ECAC-W FR 32 5 12 17 0.531
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.96
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.53
2014-15 · Rensselaer
-44.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#76
Forward overall
#6
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Brooke Avery
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.00 PPG
→ New Hampshire (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.92 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.85 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Theresa Knutson
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 3.95 PPG
→ UConn (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
1.06 Average
NCAAe PPG
Maria Lindh
SDHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.88 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Brooke Avery
New Hampshire ·
0.062 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrea Renner
Northeastern ·
0.167 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Theresa Knutson
UConn ·
0.389 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.