| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-09 | Thayer | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 0.780 | 0.4840 | 0.4840 | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Thayer | NE-Prep-Girls | 24 | 36 | 17 | 53 | 2.210 | 1.3713 | 1.3713 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Thayer | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 31 | 18 | 49 | 2.230 | 1.3837 | 1.3837 | — | — |
| 2011-12 | Thayer | NE-Prep-Girls | 7 | 22 | 15 | 37 | 5.290 | 3.2824 | 3.2824 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-16 | Syracuse | D1 | CHA-W | SR | 36 | 9 | 21 | 30 | 0.833 |
| 2014-15 | Syracuse | D1 | CHA-W | JR | 36 | 18 | 11 | 29 | 0.806 |
| 2013-14 | Syracuse | D1 | CHA-W | SO | 36 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 0.833 |
| 2012-13 | Syracuse | D1 | CHA-W | FR | 36 | 9 | 14 | 23 | 0.639 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.