← New Search ↗ Social Card

Melissa Piacentini

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 27 11 10 21 0.780 0.4840 0.4840
2009-10 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 24 36 17 53 2.210 1.3713 1.3713
2010-11 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 22 31 18 49 2.230 1.3837 1.3837
2011-12 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 7 22 15 37 5.290 3.2824 3.2824
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SR 36 9 21 30 0.833
2014-15 Syracuse D1 CHA-W JR 36 18 11 29 0.806
2013-14 Syracuse D1 CHA-W SO 36 17 13 30 0.833
2012-13 Syracuse D1 CHA-W FR 36 9 14 23 0.639
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
2.70
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.64
2012-13 · Syracuse
-76.3% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#118
Forward overall
#10
in NE-Prep-Girls

D2/3 Comparables

Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.960 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2016-17
1.321 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2013-14
1.097 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.