← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brianne Alfred

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 19 22 9 31 1.630 1.0114 1.0114
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 22 7 4 11 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.08
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2008-09 · Manhattanville
-53.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#190
Forward overall
#17
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.54 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.74 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG
→ RPI (0.03 D1 FR PPG)
0.76 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Franklin Pierce · 2022-23
0.676 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Hamline · 2013-14
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2006-07
1.107 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.