IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Katie Little

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Proctor NE-Prep-Girls 33 32 11 43 1.300 0.8067 0.8067 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2012-13 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 28 12 16 28 1.000
2011-12 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 27 17 9 26 0.963
2010-11 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 28 12 22 34 1.214
2009-10 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 27 27 15 42 1.556
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.80
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.56
2009-10 · Manhattanville
+93.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#398
Forward overall
#39
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Lauren Abbenante
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.59 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Andrea Renner
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.00 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.58 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ivy Dynek
USHS-W · 2012-13 · 1.92 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.56 No data
NCAAe PPG
Kelly Pannek
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 3.45 PPG
→ Minnesota (1.07 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Nicole Schammel
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 3.44 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.55 Strong
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jessica Bird
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2012-13
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Brie Larkowski
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Kassie Lien
Saint Mary's (MN) · 2012-13
0.417 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.