| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 8 | 9 | 17 | 0.630 | 0.3909 | 0.3909 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 1.500 | 0.9308 | 0.9308 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Southern Maine | D3 | NEHC | SR | 23 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.174 |
| 2013-14 | Southern Maine | D3 | NEHC | JR | 26 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.308 |
| 2012-13 | Southern Maine | D3 | NEHC | SO | 25 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0.160 |
| 2011-12 | Southern Maine | D3 | NEHC | FR | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.