← New Search ↗ Social Card

Talya Bent

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 27 8 9 17 0.630 0.3909 0.3909
2010-11 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 8 9 3 12 1.500 0.9308 0.9308
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SR 23 2 2 4 0.174
2013-14 Southern Maine D3 NEHC JR 26 2 6 8 0.308
2012-13 Southern Maine D3 NEHC SO 25 1 3 4 0.160
2011-12 Southern Maine D3 NEHC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#2289
Forward overall
#168
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.48 PPG
→ Brown (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 4.16 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.67 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.27 PPG
→ Mercyhurst (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.66 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 4.36 PPG
→ UConn (0.27 D1 FR PPG)
0.70 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.50 PPG
→ St. Cloud State
0.73 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Endicott · 2015-16
0.667 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Amherst · 2005-06
1.107 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.