IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kelcie Finn

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2009-10 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 24 6 6 12 0.500 0.3103 0.3103 — —
2010-11 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 22 9 19 28 1.270 0.7880 0.7880 — —
2011-12 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 7 6 11 17 2.430 1.5078 1.5078 — —
2012-13 Thayer NE-Prep-Girls 20 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2013-14 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 25 2 0 2 0.080 0.0496 0.0496 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Trinity D3 NESCAC SR 22 10 5 15 0.682
2016-17 Trinity D3 NESCAC JR 25 8 5 13 0.520
2015-16 Trinity D3 NESCAC SO 25 7 7 14 0.560
2014-15 Trinity D3 NESCAC FR 27 9 10 19 0.704
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.59
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.70
2014-15 · Trinity
+19.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#5711
Forward overall
#363
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Lexi Edwards
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Sacred Heart (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Katie McMillan
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Penn State (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lucy Burton
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Yale
0.04 No data
NCAAe PPG
Katie Huntington
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Quinnipiac
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mallory Rushton
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.03 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Leah Elledge
Lindenwood · 2012-13
0.032 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Harper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kristen Kiggen
LIU · 2023-24
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.