IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sara Ugalde

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 22 8 2 10 0.450 0.2792 0.2792 — —
2007-08 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 22 11 6 17 0.770 0.4778 0.4778 — —
2008-09 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 23 7 8 15 0.650 0.4033 0.4033 — —
2009-10 Westminster NE-Prep-Girls 24 2 3 5 0.210 0.1303 0.1303 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 21 7 10 17 0.810
2012-13 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 5 0 0 0 0.000
2011-12 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 3 1 4 5 1.667
2010-11 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 1 0 1 1 1.000
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.20
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.00
2010-11 · Middlebury
+387.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#3572
Forward overall
#247
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Madison Oelkers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.61 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kourtney Menches
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 0.34 PPG
→ Vermont (0.08 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Joie Phelps
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Cornell (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mac Johnson
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Karin Knapp
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Amanda Smythe
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2024-25
0.105 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Talon Berlando
Wisconsin-Superior · 2004-05
0.609 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.