IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Amy Allen

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2003-04 Loomis Chaffee NE-Prep-Girls 20 0 1 1 0.050 0.0310 0.0310 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2009-10 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 23 10 7 17 0.739
2008-09 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 25 15 4 19 0.760
2007-08 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 25 5 7 12 0.480
2006-07 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 26 8 11 19 0.731
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2006-07 · Hamilton
+2657.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15096
Forward overall
#1270
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Sharon Frankel
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.05 PPG
→ Princeton (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stella Haberman
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.12 PPG
→ RIT (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Olivia Arkell
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Minnesota
0.03 No data
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mullins
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (0.31 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Becca Gilmore
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.04 PPG
→ Harvard (1.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.02 Elite
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexa March
Saint Mary's · 2023-24
0.095 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kristen Kiggen
LIU · 2023-24
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Harper
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.292 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.