icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003-04 | St. Mark's | NE-Prep-Girls | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| 2005-06 | St. Mark's | NE-Prep-Girls | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 | — | — | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-10 | Connecticut College | D3 | NESCAC | SR | 25 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 0.640 |
| 2008-09 | Connecticut College | D3 | NESCAC | JR | 25 | 7 | 6 | 13 | 0.520 |
| 2007-08 | Connecticut College | D3 | NESCAC | SO | 24 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 0.417 |
| 2006-07 | Connecticut College | D3 | NESCAC | FR | 22 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 0.364 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.