IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Courtney Dumont

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2006-07 North Yarmouth Academy NE-Prep-Girls 17 22 6 28 1.650 1.0238 1.0238 — —
2007-08 North Yarmouth Academy NE-Prep-Girls 24 30 16 46 1.920 1.1914 1.1914 — —
2008-09 North Yarmouth Academy NE-Prep-Girls 26 42 6 48 1.850 1.1479 1.1479 — —
2009-10 North Yarmouth Academy NE-Prep-Girls 25 5 0 5 0.200 0.1241 0.1241 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2013-14 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 23 9 9 18 0.783
2012-13 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 25 9 4 13 0.520
2011-12 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 24 12 9 21 0.875
2010-11 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 24 18 10 28 1.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.50
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
1.17
2010-11 · Connecticut College
+134.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#639
Forward overall
#53
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Rose Rather
NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.82 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Holly Dietzler
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Lindenwood (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jessica Bonfe
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kylie Hanley
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 0.84 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Rose Rather
Holy Cross ·
0.824 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Suvi Ollikainen
St. Cloud State ·
0.151 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Holly Dietzler
Lindenwood ·
0.108 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.