| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-08 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 22 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.230 | 0.1427 | 0.1427 | — | — |
| 2008-09 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 25 | 15 | 18 | 33 | 1.320 | 0.8191 | 0.8191 | — | — |
| 2009-10 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 27 | 20 | 21 | 41 | 1.520 | 0.9432 | 0.9432 | — | — |
| 2010-11 | Hebron | NE-Prep-Girls | 8 | 6 | 14 | 20 | 2.500 | 1.5513 | 1.5513 | — | — |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | Salve Regina | D3 | NEHC | SR | 25 | 12 | 14 | 26 | 1.040 |
| 2013-14 | Salve Regina | D3 | NEHC | JR | 26 | 12 | 12 | 24 | 0.923 |
| 2012-13 | Salve Regina | D3 | NEHC | SO | 25 | 10 | 16 | 26 | 1.040 |
| 2011-12 | Salve Regina | D3 | NEHC | FR | 26 | 13 | 7 | 20 | 0.769 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.