← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sarah Markey

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2007-08 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 22 3 2 5 0.230 0.1427 0.1427
2008-09 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 25 15 18 33 1.320 0.8191 0.8191
2009-10 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 27 20 21 41 1.520 0.9432 0.9432
2010-11 Hebron NE-Prep-Girls 8 6 14 20 2.500 1.5513 1.5513
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 NEHC SR 25 12 14 26 1.040
2013-14 Salve Regina D3 NEHC JR 26 12 12 24 0.923
2012-13 Salve Regina D3 NEHC SO 25 10 16 26 1.040
2011-12 Salve Regina D3 NEHC FR 26 13 7 20 0.769
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
1.40
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.77
2011-12 · Salve Regina
-45.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#550
Forward overall
#48
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 2.44 PPG
→ Boston College (0.89 D1 FR PPG)
1.51 Elite
NCAAe PPG
SDHL · 2012-13 · 1.08 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
1.44 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Boston College ·
0.892 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Minnesota Duluth ·
0.216 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.