IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Shelby Johnson

Position: Forward DOB: ⚠ Missing — add in admin Country: ?
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 21 4 3 7 0.330 0.2048 0.2048 — —
2009-10 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 18 4 4 8 0.440 0.2730 0.2730 — —
2010-11 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 16 20 7 27 1.690 1.0486 1.0486 — —
2011-12 Vermont Academy NE-Prep-Girls 16 11 5 16 1.000 0.6205 0.6205 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2015-16 Salve Regina D3 NEHC SR 26 4 13 17 0.654
2014-15 Salve Regina D3 NEHC JR 25 0 4 4 0.160
2013-14 Salve Regina D3 NEHC SO 26 6 9 15 0.577
2012-13 Salve Regina D3 NEHC FR 25 6 4 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.79
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2012-13 · Salve Regina
-49.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#672
Forward overall
#56
in NE-Prep-Girls

D1 Comparables

Reagan Haley
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Lauren Abbenante
USHS-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG
→ Holy Cross (0.61 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Haley Mack
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.88 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.46 Average
NCAAe PPG
Emma Nuutinen
SMLIIGA-W · 2012-13 · 1.25 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.56 D1 FR PPG)
0.47 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Dana Rasmussen
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.96 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Megan Dulong
Wisconsin-Superior · 2016-17
0.407 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Baylee Darling
Concordia (WI) · 2012-13
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Erin Davey
Connecticut College · 2005-06
0.522 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.