IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ellie Rawlick Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2006-06-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 — CAHS-W 50 2 4 6 0.120 0.0431 0.0431 — —
2021-22 Ontario Hockey Acad Juniors OWHL-U22 21 1 2 3 0.143 0.0500 0.0541 — —
2023-24 Notre Dame Hounds SFMAAAHL-W 20 0 3 3 0.150 0.0351 0.0334 — —
2024-25 Crystal Beach Academy U19 (W) 19U-AAA-W 30 11 7 18 0.600 0.2043 0.1920 — —
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
5%
NCAA D2/D3
82%
Club / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#7082
Forward overall
#325
Forward born in 2006

D1 Comparables

Natalie Snodgrass
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.20 PPG
→ UConn (1.00 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Elite
NCAAe PPG
Melissa Haganey
19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Sydney Brodt
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.32 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.60 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Jackie Pieper
USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.32 PPG
→ Merrimack (0.32 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Liz Schepers
USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.12 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ashleigh Kowtoniuk
Connecticut College · 2005-06
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Annika Brodt
Saint Benedict · 2017-18
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Emma Holmes
Plattsburgh · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.