← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Sarah Staley Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-09-22 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Princeton
Verbal ECAC-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — ECAC-W
0.16
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.1884
Conf. Strength1.010
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.58
Average (0.35–0.65)
Base D3e-W PPG0.6819
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

32%
NCAA D1W
12%
NCAA D3W
55%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 — OWHL-U22 7 2 0 2 0.286 0.0999 0.1084
2024-25 Mississauga Hurricanes U22 OWHL-U22 32 5 7 12 0.375 0.1311 0.1350
2025-26 Mississauga Hurricanes U22 OWHL-U22 42 9 18 27 0.643 0.2248 0.2240
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Jacqueline Kaasa USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.46 PPG 0.143 Bemidji State
Danielle Marmer 19U-AAA-W · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG 0.108 Quinnipiac
Lindsay Roethke USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.52 PPG 0.027 UConn
Sydney Brodt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.54 PPG 0.600 Minnesota Duluth
Aly Tremblay USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.61 PPG 0.030 RPI

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Emily Olsthoorn 2024-25 · 1.00 PPG 0.818 Colby NESCAC
Rose Aldridge 2022-23 · 2.08 PPG — Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Olivia Aquino 2024-25 · 2.00 PPG — RPI ECAC
Priscilla Orr 2014-15 · 2.07 PPG — Lebanon Valley UCHC
Ella Hansen 2022-23 · 1.69 PPG 0.500 Wisconsin-Eau Claire WIAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.