← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Eden Bergman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Boston University
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — HEA-W
0.16
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2225
Conf. Strength1.157
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.69
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8056
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
20%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2331 0.2331
2024-25 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 36 9 11 20 0.556 0.1942 0.1942
2025-26 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 42 13 16 29 0.691 0.2414 0.2414
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Andrea Renner USHS-W · 2012-13 · 2.93 PPG 0.167 Northeastern
Sierra Alarid USHS-W · 2013-14 · 2.93 PPG 0.188 Post
Kiki Radke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG 0.273 Bemidji State

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jillian Bilsborough 2023-24 · 1.82 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Bre Simon 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG 1.000 Hamline MIAC
Casey Brown 2010-11 · 2.18 PPG — Hamilton NESCAC
Rachel Kennedy 2011-12 · 0.82 PPG 1.067 Bowdoin NESCAC
Ari Smith 2011-12 · 2.17 PPG — Elmira UCHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.