← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Eden Bergman Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: Unknown Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Boston University
Verbal HEA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.19
Developing (<0.25)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.2229
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
0.69
Strong (0.65–1.00)
Base D3e-W PPG0.8056
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencehigh
Seasons Used2

D1W / D3W Likelihood

18%
NCAA D1W
20%
NCAA D3W
62%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2023-24 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.2335 0.2335
2024-25 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 36 9 11 20 0.556 0.1946 0.1946
2025-26 Durham West Jr. Lightning OWHL-U22 42 13 16 29 0.691 0.2418 0.2418
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Brooke Madsen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.60 PPG 0.600 Penn State
Lydia Passolt USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.60 PPG 0.095 Bemidji State
Kiki Radke USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.58 PPG 0.273 Bemidji State
Sophia Kunin USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 1.62 PPG 0.425 Wisconsin
Taylor Williamson USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 1.64 PPG 0.395 Minnesota

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Jillian Bilsborough 2023-24 · 1.82 PPG 0.481 Aurora NCHA
Geneva Lloyd 2006-07 · 0.79 PPG 1.107 Amherst NESCAC
Bre Simon 2013-14 · 0.88 PPG 1.000 Hamline MIAC
Casey Brown 2010-11 · 2.18 PPG Hamilton NESCAC
Rachel Kennedy 2011-12 · 0.82 PPG 1.067 Bowdoin NESCAC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.