← Women's Search ↗ Social Card

Rio Pierre Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2008-04-07 Country: Canada
NCAA-W Projection
Robert Morris
Verbal CHA-W D1W

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I Women's

Projected PPG — WCHA-W
0.34
Average (0.25–0.45)
Base NCAAe-W PPG0.4015
Conf. Strength0.997
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

NCAA D3W

Projected PPG — Division Avg
1.24
Elite (1.00+)
Base D3e-W PPG1.4509
Conf. Strength1.000
Year Adj (FR)×0.80
Confidencelow
Seasons Used1

D1W / D3W Likelihood

60%
NCAA D1W
8%
NCAA D3W
32%
Club / Other

Based on 40 comparable players

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid = age-adjusted NCAAe-W PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG

Pre-College Seasons

Most women's college players come directly from high school hockey. Junior or HS season stats below (when available on Elite Prospects).

SeasonTeamLeagueGP GAPtsPPG NCAAe-W PPGAge-Adjusted
2025-26 Kingston Jr. Ice Wolves OWHL-U22 45 33 20 53 1.178 0.4125 0.4015
NCAAe-W = points/game translated to NCAA-W equivalent  ·  COVID-flagged seasons in yellow

Historical Comparables — NCAA D1W

PlayerLeague · Season · PPG FR College PPGSchool
Dana Rasmussen USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.62 PPG 0.167 Ohio State
Lauren Abbenante NE-Prep-Girls · 2012-13 · 1.30 PPG 0.607 Holy Cross
Katie Rooney USHS-MN-W · 2012-13 · 2.52 PPG 0.219 RPI
Darby Dodds USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.52 PPG 0.000 Lindenwood
Reagan Haley USHS-MN-W · 2013-14 · 2.80 PPG 0.108 Minnesota Duluth

Historical Comparables — NCAA D3W

PlayerJunior Season · PPG FR College PPGSchoolConference
Celia Midtbo 2022-23 · 1.73 PPG 0.840 Saint Mary's (MN) MIAC
Amber Tilander 2017-18 · 2.22 PPG 0.655 St. Scholastica NCHA
Erica Power 2013-14 · 1.40 PPG 1.038 Gustavus Adolphus MIAC
Mikaila Rubin 2016-17 · 2.21 PPG 0.654 Nazareth UCHC
Alyssa Hulst 2015-16 · 2.08 PPG 0.700 Norwich NEHC

Women's college hockey projections draw primarily on high school and junior stats when available. Because most women go directly from HS to college, projections with limited pre-college data use conference-based priors.

NCAAe-W factors are derived from historical pre-college→NCAA-W transitions. For many players, projection confidence is lower than men's due to sparse pre-college tracking.